TREATMENT OF CENTRAL RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION

Overview of diagnosis and treatment of central retinal vein occlusion.

rvo_crvo_fp

Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) is a vascular disorder that occurs when the main central retinal vein, which drains blood from the retina, becomes blocked. This blockage can lead to significant vision impairment due to the disruption of blood flow, retinal hemorrhages, macular edema, and other complications. CRVO can be categorized into two main types: non-ischemic (mild) and ischemic (more severe), based on the extent of blood flow disruption.

Treatment options for central retinal vein occlusion aim to manage complications, alleviate symptoms, and, if possible, improve or stabilize vision. Here are some of the common treatment options:

1. Observation:

  • In some cases, especially with non-ischemic CRVO that has mild symptoms, observation without immediate intervention may be considered. Regular monitoring of the condition is important to detect any changes.

2. Anti-VEGF Injections:

  • Lucentis (ranibizumab), Eylea (aflibercept), and Avastin (bevacizumab): These are anti-VEGF medications that are injected into the eye to block vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Anti-VEGF therapy is aimed at reducing macular edema and preventing abnormal blood vessel growth.  While most patient with CRVO require ongoing (forever) therapy with Anti-VEGF agents, about 40 percent of patients can safely stop the treatments after about four years.

3. Steroid Injections:

  • Ozurdex (dexamethasone implant): Ozurdex is a sustained-release corticosteroid implant injected into the eye. It helps reduce inflammation and treat macular edema by releasing dexamethasone over time.

4. Laser Therapy (Photocoagulation):

  • Laser photocoagulation may be used to treat macular edema associated with CRVO. Focal laser treatment is applied to seal leaking blood vessels and reduce edema. However, the use of laser has decreased with the advent of anti-VEGF medications.

5. Retinal Surgery:

  • In some cases of severe complications, such as vitreous hemorrhage, neovascular glaucoma, and retinal detachment, surgical intervention may be considered.

The choice of treatment depends on factors such as the severity of macular edema, the presence of neovascularization, the patient’s overall health, and individual response to treatments. It’s common for ophthalmologists to tailor the treatment plan based on the specific characteristics of the CRVO case.

Regular follow-up appointments and ongoing monitoring are crucial to assess the effectiveness of the chosen treatment and to make any necessary adjustments. Early detection and intervention can be important in managing CRVO and preventing further vision loss.

crvo with cotton wool spots

Observation without immediate intervention may be appropriate for certain cases of central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), particularly in situations where the condition is mild, and the patient is not experiencing significant vision-threatening complications. The decision for observation is typically based on factors such as the degree of vision impairment, the presence of macular edema, and the overall health of the patient.

When Observation May be Appropriate:

  1. Non-Ischemic CRVO:
    • If the CRVO is classified as non-ischemic (mild), there may be a lower risk of significant complications, and the patient’s symptoms may be less severe.
  2. Mild or Stable Symptoms:
    • When the patient’s symptoms are mild or stable, and there is no immediate threat to vision, the approach may involve close monitoring without immediate intervention.
  3. No Macular Edema or Complications:
    • In cases where there is no significant macular edema or complications such as neovascularization, the ophthalmologist may opt for observation.

Frequency of Follow-Up Visits:

The frequency of follow-up visits during the observation period can vary based on the individual case and the ophthalmologist’s judgment. Typically, patients may be seen at regular intervals, ranging from a few weeks to a few months, to monitor the progression of the condition and assess any changes in vision.

Symptoms to Watch Out For Between Doctor Visits:

Patients undergoing observation for CRVO should be vigilant for any changes in their vision and report any new or worsening symptoms to their ophthalmologist between scheduled visits. Symptoms to watch out for may include:

  1. Sudden Changes in Vision:
    • Any sudden decrease in vision or the onset of new visual symptoms should be reported promptly.
  2. Distorted Vision:
    • Distortions in vision, such as seeing wavy or crooked lines, may indicate changes in the macula and should be reported.
  3. Increased Floaters or Flashes:
    • An increase in the number of floaters or the perception of flashes of light may suggest changes in the vitreous or the presence of new complications.
  4. Eye Pain or Redness:
    • Pain, redness, or discomfort in the eye should be reported, as it may indicate the development of complications.
  5. Changes in Color Vision:
    • Any changes in color vision or perception should be brought to the attention of the ophthalmologist.
  6. New-Onset Headache:
    • Persistent or severe headaches may warrant attention, as they can sometimes be associated with increased intraocular pressure.

Patients are encouraged to communicate openly with their healthcare provider and promptly seek medical attention if they notice any concerning changes in their vision or experience new symptoms. Regular communication and follow-up visits with the ophthalmologist are crucial to monitor the condition and adjust the management plan as needed.

CRVO with edema - OCT scan

Avastin, also known as bevacizumab, is an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) medication that is sometimes used off-label for the treatment of macular edema associated with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Off-label use means that the medication is being used for a purpose not specifically approved by regulatory agencies but has been found to be effective in certain cases.

Avastin Treatment for CRVO:

  1. Mechanism of Action:
    • Avastin works by inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a protein that plays a key role in the formation of abnormal blood vessels and increased vascular permeability.
    • By blocking VEGF, Avastin helps reduce the growth of abnormal blood vessels and decreases fluid leakage into the retina.
  2. Administration:
    • Avastin is administered as an intravitreal injection, meaning it is injected directly into the vitreous humor of the eye.
    • The injection is typically performed in an ophthalmologist’s office.
  3. Treatment Schedule:
    • The treatment regimen with Avastin may involve a series of injections over time.
    • The frequency of injections and the overall duration of treatment are determined by the treating ophthalmologist based on the patient’s response and the severity of macular edema.

Considerations:

  • Off-Label Use: The use of Avastin for CRVO is considered off-label, as it has not been specifically approved by regulatory agencies for this indication.
  • Effectiveness: Studies and clinical experience suggest that Avastin may be effective in reducing macular edema and improving visual outcomes in some patients with CRVO.
  • Choice of Treatment: The decision to use Avastin for CRVO is often made by the treating ophthalmologist based on the individual characteristics of the condition, the patient’s overall health, and the assessment of potential benefits and risks.
  • Alternatives: Other anti-VEGF medications, such as Lucentis (ranibizumab) and Eylea (aflibercept), are specifically approved for the treatment of macular edema associated with CRVO. The choice between medications may depend on factors such as the patient’s response to treatment and the ophthalmologist’s preference.

Risks and Side Effects:

  • As with any intravitreal injection, there is a small risk of infection, bleeding, or other complications.
  • Patients receiving Avastin injections should be closely monitored for any adverse effects.

It’s important for individuals undergoing Avastin treatment for CRVO to have regular follow-up appointments with their ophthalmologist to monitor the response to treatment and make any necessary adjustments. The decision to use Avastin or any other medication should be made after a thorough discussion between the patient and the healthcare professional, weighing the potential benefits against the risks for the specific case.

crvo_3line
crvo_vachange
PLEASE discuss lucentis therapy for crvo, when it was fda approved for crvo and also mention the clinical trials that were done to show it is effective.
ChatGPT
ChatGPT

Lucentis (ranibizumab) is an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) medication that has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of macular edema associated with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).

Lucentis Therapy for CRVO:

  1. FDA Approval:
    • Lucentis was FDA-approved for the treatment of macular edema following CRVO in 2010.
  2. Mechanism of Action:
    • Lucentis works by inhibiting VEGF, a protein that plays a crucial role in the growth of abnormal blood vessels and increased vascular permeability.
    • By blocking VEGF, Lucentis helps reduce macular edema and improve visual outcomes in patients with CRVO.

Clinical Trials:

Several clinical trials have been conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of Lucentis for the treatment of macular edema associated with CRVO. Here are key trials:

  1. CRUISE Study:
    • The CRUISE study was a pivotal phase III clinical trial that evaluated the efficacy and safety of Lucentis in patients with macular edema following CRVO.
    • Results from the CRUISE study demonstrated that monthly injections of Lucentis significantly improved visual acuity compared to sham injections (control group) at six months.
    • The improvements were sustained over a one-year period.
  2. CRUISE Extension Study:
    • An extension of the CRUISE study assessed the long-term safety and efficacy of Lucentis in patients with CRVO.
    • The extension study confirmed the durability of visual and anatomic improvements with continued treatment.

Treatment Approach:

  • The typical treatment approach with Lucentis involves an initial loading phase with monthly injections for a certain duration, followed by a maintenance phase with less frequent injections as needed.
  • The treatment plan is individualized based on the patient’s response and the severity of macular edema.

Considerations:

  • Lucentis is one of the standard-of-care treatments for macular edema associated with CRVO, and its use is supported by substantial clinical evidence.
  • While Lucentis has shown efficacy in improving visual outcomes, individual responses to treatment may vary.
  • Ophthalmologists carefully assess the specific characteristics of each patient’s case to determine the most appropriate treatment plan.

It’s important for individuals undergoing Lucentis therapy for CRVO to have regular follow-up appointments with their ophthalmologist to monitor the response to treatment and make any necessary adjustments. As with any medical intervention, potential benefits and risks should be discussed thoroughly between the patient and the healthcare professional.

eylea_crvo_visiongain
eylea_crvo_va

Eylea (aflibercept) is an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) medication that has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of macular edema associated with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Here’s an overview of Eylea therapy for CRVO, including FDA approval information and key clinical trials:

Eylea Therapy for CRVO:

  1. FDA Approval:
    • Eylea was FDA-approved for the treatment of macular edema following CRVO in September 2012.
  2. Mechanism of Action:
    • Like other anti-VEGF medications, Eylea inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a protein that plays a central role in abnormal blood vessel growth and increased vascular permeability.
    • By blocking VEGF, Eylea helps reduce macular edema and improve visual outcomes in patients with CRVO.

Clinical Trials:

Several clinical trials have been conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of Eylea for the treatment of macular edema associated with CRVO. Here are key trials:

  1. COPERNICUS Study:
    • The COPERNICUS study was a phase III clinical trial that evaluated the efficacy and safety of Eylea in patients with macular edema secondary to CRVO.
    • Results from COPERNICUS demonstrated that Eylea significantly improved visual acuity compared to sham injections (control group) at six months.
    • Patients in the Eylea group also experienced significant reductions in central retinal thickness.
  2. GALILEO Study:
    • Similar to COPERNICUS, the GALILEO study was a phase III clinical trial that investigated the use of Eylea in patients with macular edema secondary to CRVO.
    • Results from GALILEO also showed that Eylea-treated patients achieved significant improvements in visual acuity and reductions in central retinal thickness compared to the control group.

Treatment Approach:

  • The typical treatment approach with Eylea involves an initial loading phase with monthly injections for a certain duration, followed by a maintenance phase with less frequent injections as needed.
  • The treatment plan is individualized based on the patient’s response and the severity of macular edema.

Considerations:

  • Eylea is considered one of the standard-of-care treatments for macular edema associated with CRVO, and its use is supported by robust clinical evidence.
  • While Eylea has shown efficacy in improving visual outcomes, individual responses to treatment may vary.
  • Ophthalmologists carefully assess the specific characteristics of each patient’s case to determine the most appropriate treatment plan.

It’s important for individuals undergoing Eylea therapy for CRVO to have regular follow-up appointments with their ophthalmologist to monitor the response to treatment and make any necessary adjustments. As with any medical intervention, potential benefits and risks should be discussed thoroughly between the patient and the healthcare professional.

ozurdex implant

Ozurdex (dexamethasone intravitreal implant) is a sustained-release corticosteroid implant that has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of macular edema associated with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Here’s an overview of Ozurdex therapy for CRVO, including FDA approval information, its comparison to anti-VEGF therapy, and considerations for use:

Ozurdex Therapy for CRVO:

  1. FDA Approval:
    • Ozurdex was FDA-approved for the treatment of macular edema associated with CRVO in September 2014.
  2. Mechanism of Action:
    • Ozurdex contains dexamethasone, a corticosteroid that has anti-inflammatory properties.
    • The implant is injected into the vitreous humor of the eye and releases dexamethasone gradually, providing sustained anti-inflammatory effects.

Comparison to Anti-VEGF Therapy:

Ozurdex:

  • Anti-inflammatory Mechanism: Ozurdex primarily addresses inflammation associated with macular edema.
  • Sustained Release: The implant provides sustained release of dexamethasone, reducing the need for frequent injections.
  • Alternative Option: Ozurdex may be considered when anti-VEGF therapy is not well-tolerated or if there is a preference for a less frequent injection schedule.

Anti-VEGF Therapy:

  • Anti-VEGF Mechanism: Medications like Lucentis, Eylea, and Avastin work by inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), addressing abnormal blood vessel growth and leakage.
  • Frequent Injections: Anti-VEGF therapy often requires more frequent injections, typically on a monthly or bimonthly schedule.
  • Well-Established: Anti-VEGF therapy has been well-established as an effective treatment for macular edema associated with CRVO.

When Ozurdex is Considered for Use:

Ozurdex may be considered in the following scenarios:

  1. As Initial Treatment:
    • Ozurdex may be considered as an initial treatment for macular edema associated with CRVO, especially in cases where anti-VEGF therapy is not feasible or preferred.
  2. When Anti-VEGF Therapy is Not Well-Tolerated:
    • Some individuals may not tolerate anti-VEGF injections well due to various reasons such as side effects or contraindications.
  3. When There’s a Preference for Less Frequent Injections:
    • Ozurdex provides sustained release over several months, which may be advantageous for individuals who prefer a less frequent injection schedule.
  4. As Adjunctive Therapy:
    • In certain cases, Ozurdex may be used in conjunction with anti-VEGF therapy to achieve a more comprehensive approach to managing macular edema.

Considerations:

  • The choice between Ozurdex and anti-VEGF therapy is often individualized based on factors such as the patient’s overall health, the severity of macular edema, and the response to previous treatments.
  • Regular follow-up appointments are essential to monitor the response to treatment and make any necessary adjustments.

It’s crucial for individuals undergoing Ozurdex therapy for CRVO to have regular follow-up appointments with their ophthalmologist to assess the response to treatment and make adjustments to the treatment plan as needed. The decision to use Ozurdex or any other medication should be made after a thorough discussion between the patient and the healthcare professional, weighing the potential benefits against the risks for the specific case.

Laser therapy for central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) involves the use of laser energy to treat complications associated with CRVO, such as neovascularization. .

1. Panretinal Laser Photocoagulation:

  • Procedure:
    • Panretinal laser therapy is used to treat neovascularization, the abnormal growth of new blood vessels in the retina.
    • The laser is applied to the peripheral areas of the retina to reduce the abnormal blood vessel growth and prevent complications like vitreous hemorrhage.
  • Indications:
    • Panretinal laser therapy is typically recommended in cases where neovascularization is present.
  • Comparison with Anti-VEGF Therapy:
    • Benefits: Laser therapy can be effective in reducing abnormal blood vessel growth and preventing complications.
    • Drawbacks: Similar to focal laser therapy, panretinal laser therapy has potential side effects, including loss of peripheral vision. It may not be as commonly used as anti-VEGF therapy, especially when addressing neovascularization.

Considerations and Comparison with Anti-VEGF Therapy:

Laser Therapy:

  • Treatment Approach: Laser therapy is more of a localized treatment, targeting specific areas of the retina.
  • Timing of Intervention: Laser therapy is often considered in cases where anti-VEGF therapy may not be suitable or effective.
  • Side Effects: Laser therapy carries the risk of scarring and potential damage to treated areas.

Anti-VEGF Therapy:

  • Treatment Approach: Anti-VEGF therapy addresses the underlying cause by inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), reducing abnormal blood vessel growth and fluid leakage.
  • Timing of Intervention: Anti-VEGF therapy is often considered a first-line treatment for macular edema and neovascularization in CRVO.
  • Side Effects: Intravitreal injections carry a risk of infection and other complications, but the side effect profile may be considered more favorable compared to certain risks associated with laser therapy.

The choice between laser therapy and anti-VEGF therapy is often individualized and based on factors such as the characteristics of CRVO, the presence of macular edema or neovascularization, and the patient’s overall health. Advances in anti-VEGF therapies have become a primary choice for many cases of CRVO due to their targeted approach and favorable risk-benefit profile. However, the decision ultimately depends on the specific clinical scenario and the judgment of the treating ophthalmologist. Regular follow-up appointments are essential to monitor the response to treatment and make any necessary adjustments.

 

 

Surgical interventions for central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) are typically considered in specific cases where complications, such as vitreous hemorrhage and neovascular glaucoma, require more direct and invasive management. Two common surgical procedures that may be employed in such situations are vitrectomy and the use of glaucoma drainage devices, such as the Ahmed valve.

1. Vitrectomy for Vitreous Hemorrhage:

Procedure:

  • Vitrectomy is a surgical procedure that involves the removal of the vitreous humor, the gel-like substance within the eye.
  • The procedure aims to address complications such as vitreous hemorrhage, where blood accumulates in the vitreous, obscuring vision.
  • During vitrectomy, the surgeon removes the vitreous and replaces it with a clear saline solution.

Indications:

  • Vitrectomy may be considered in cases of severe vitreous hemorrhage that significantly impairs vision.

Postoperative Considerations:

  • Laser Photocoagulation: During vitrectomy, laser photocoagulation may be performed reduce the risk of recurrent bleeding from neovascularization.
  • Fluid-Gas Exchange: In rare cases, a gas or silicone oil may be injected into the eye to provide tamponade and support retinal reattachment.

2. Treatment of Neovascular Glaucoma with Ahmed Valve:

Procedure:

  • Ahmed Valve (Glaucoma Drainage Device): Neovascular glaucoma, a complication of CRVO characterized by the growth of abnormal blood vessels in the angle of the eye, may require surgical intervention to manage intraocular pressure (IOP).
  • The Ahmed valve is a type of glaucoma drainage device that is surgically implanted to facilitate the drainage of excess aqueous humor and reduce elevated IOP.

Indications:

  • Ahmed valve implantation may be considered when neovascular glaucoma is not effectively managed with medications or laser therapy.

Postoperative Considerations:

  • Laser Therapy: Laser therapy may be combined with Ahmed valve implantation to treat neovascularization and enhance the effectiveness of the drainage device.
  • Regular Monitoring: Postoperative follow-up is crucial to monitor IOP and assess the success of the glaucoma management.

Considerations and Challenges:

  • Risk of Complications: Both vitrectomy and glaucoma drainage device implantation carry risks and potential complications, and the decision to proceed with surgery is made on a case-by-case basis.
  • Individualized Approach: The choice between vitrectomy, glaucoma drainage devices, or a combination of procedures depends on the specific clinical features, severity of complications, and the overall health of the patient.
  • Collaborative Care: The management of CRVO complications often involves collaboration between retinal specialists and glaucoma specialists to address both retinal and intraocular pressure-related issues.

Surgical interventions for complications of CRVO are typically considered when conservative measures, such as medications or laser therapy, are insufficient. The decision to pursue surgery is made in consultation with an ophthalmologist based on a comprehensive evaluation of the individual case. Regular follow-up care is essential to monitor the outcomes of surgical interventions and address any postoperative considerations.